White South Africans are quick to complain that affirmative action and black economic empowerment policies have stymied their career opportunities and chances of economic advancement in South Africa. Curiously, however, a review of income and employment indicators for the country does not bare this out. Rather there is now some evidence that the white community may turn out to be an inadvertent beneficiary of the Government’s various empowerment and affirmative action policies.
In 2009 levels of unemployment among white South Africans stood at
around five percent. This was considerably lower than the national
average of just over 23% and even further below the figure of 27.9% for
Africans. The unemployment rate for white South Africans was in fact
half that for the United States.
Employment equity reports indicate
that white South Africans also continue to occupy about 70% of top and
senior management jobs in South Africa. They also occupy more than half
of all professionally qualified positions. Africans on the other hand
occupy under 20% of top and senior management positions and only
slightly over 20% of all professionally qualified positions.
Since 1996 annual per capita income
for whites increased by 217%. This was only slightly below the increase
of 235% for African South Africans. White South Africans have therefore
matched the level of income increase for African South Africans even
though African incomes have grown off a much lower base. This has
happened despite the fact that the Government sought to provide
preferential economic opportunities to African South Africans.
In 2009 real per capita disposable
income for white South Africans was measured at just under R60 000 per
annum. This was six times higher than the figure of just under R10 000
per annum for African South Africans. A further income indicator
shows that while white South Africans make up an estimated 13% of
adults in South Africa they account for close on 70% of people earning
more than R500 000 per year. Almost 75% of adults in South Africa are
African but these make up only 20% of people earning over R500 000 per
annum.
On the other side of the income scale
the level of poverty in the white community was measured at 3.6% in
2008. While this figure was almost double that of 1994 it must be
compared to the poverty figure of 49% for African South Africans – a
figure largely unchanged since 1994. The measure used here to calculate
poverty was an income of below approximately R900 a month for an
individual or R3 500 for a household of 8 people.
The white community remains the most
equal of South Africa’s four major race groups. It is also the only
racial community that is now more equal on the Gini-coefficient than it
was in 1994. The Gini-coefficient measures inequality on a score from 0
to 1 with a 1 indicating complete inequality and 0 indicating complete
equality where all people would earn the same amount of income. White
South Africans score 0.45 on this scale down from 0.49 in 1996. This is
almost on a par with the figure of 0.4 for the United States. The
figure for the African community stands at around 0.6, up from 0.54 in
1996. Scores of over 0.55 are deemed to indicate extremely high levels
of inequality.
While incomes and living standards
for African South Africans have improved since 1994 the data is
unambiguous that white South Africans continue to maintain a vastly
superior standard of living when compared to the standard enjoyed by
African South Africans.
This poses two questions. The first
is why so many white South Africans are so quick to feel that their
opportunities for career advancement and economic prosperity are
limited. Doubtless affirmative action and black economic empowerment
policy is discriminatory and has closed opportunities for whites to
access soft jobs in the public service and ‘easy’ tenders for
government work. Yet despite these ‘challenges’ the white community’s
standard of living has been maintained and in fact improved.
This suggests that the discriminatory
employment and empowerment policies of the ANC may have forged a
greater sense of entrepreneurship and independence among white South
Africans. This despite the fact that large sections of the white
community had always shown a flair for entrepreneurial activity. Now
without the opportunity of soft jobs in the public service (or private
sector) or of doing business with government many whites have been
forced to become more independent and take what might be described as
even greater ‘personal responsibility’ for improving their own
standards of living. Cut off and effectively discriminated against by
the State it can only be entrepreneurship, the taking of risks, and the
acquisition of ever improving levels of education and expertise that
explain the maintenance and improvement in living standards within the
white community after 1994.
Further examples of this growing
independence from the State can be taken as far as to include reliance
on private healthcare and security through which many whites now have
access to far higher standards of service than those on offer through
the public sector. This independence may even be considered to include
the very large number of young white South Africans who have taken the
risk to pursue careers in other parts of the world even as they
maintain close social, family, and economic ties with South
Africa.
Arguably, therefore, the income and
employment data above is early evidence that white South Africa might
emerge as the unlikely beneficiary of affirmative action and black
economic empowerment. What is certain is that the independent and
entrepreneurial mindset that may have been further invigorated by black
economic empowerment and affirmative action will come to be a
formidable economic asset.
The second question is the converse
of the first and is why so many African South Africans still appear to
cling to the hope that Government driven affirmative action and
empowerment policies offer them a real chance at escaping poverty. Over
a decade of evidence now suggests that other than the establishment of
a small African middle class, most Africans have been left behind. The
proponents of affirmative action and empowerment policy will argue that
these policies have not failed but rather that they were not enforced
or implemented properly by Government. Some on the left of the economic
spectrum now even advocate granting the Government authority to
nationalize private business in order to hand this ‘wealth’ over to the
poor.
This mindset of ‘government will
provide for me’ if only it was granted even greater powers and
responsibility is likely to see affirmative action and empowerment
policies continued. It may even lead to more extreme economic policies
including nationalization. However, when one considers education data
which shows that white children significantly outperform African
children in school subjects such as science and mathematics the
suggestion that the failure of affirmative action and empowerment
policy lies in weak enforcement seems implausible. So does the argument
that white wealth lies primarily in mines and banks. If anything the
record of white living standards after 1994 suggests that that wealth
now rests primarily in the mindset and the skills-set of that community
which is an asset that the Government can never expropriate. The
failure of public education alone has sabotaged the chance of African
South Africans gaining any broad benefit from affirmative action or
black economic empowerment or that they will wrest much benefit from
the confiscation of a major bank or mining company.
The difficulty of improving African
living conditions will of course be even further compounded by the
mindset that has been cultivated to believe that ‘government will
provide’. For there can be no chance of this mindset competing on an
equal economic footing with the growing independence and self reliance
on display in the white community. Herein lies what may well become the
cliché of South Africa’s future and irony of its recent past, that
affirmative action and black economic empowerment policy disempowered
its greatest proponents while empowering its most fervent critics.
South Africa’s ‘racial communities’
often appear to be stuck in perceptions of reality that bare little
resemblance to facts about the country. As the French philosopher
Pierre Valery commented, “a fact poorly observed is more treacherous
than faulty reasoning”. As a result for many whites the argument that
affirmative action will stall their economic progress is repeated
verbatim even as their relatively high standards of living are
maintained. For African South Africans the idea that the Government
will lead their emancipation from poverty survives in support for the
Government despite the growing evidence that such emancipation is now
unlikely. In politics perceptions are often more important than reality
and therefore the unsubstantiated perceptions of both white and African
South Africans come to dominate much discussion about racism and
poverty in the country. What is unfortunately likely is that
maintaining this status-quo is going to cause future problems both for
race relations and for the general stability of the country.
-
Frans Cronje